Loading organization details...
Loading organization details...
Source: IRS e-Filed Form 990 (from the IRS e-File system), Tax Year 2024
Total Revenue
▼$26.5M
Program Spending
76%
of total expenses go to program services
Total Contributions
$23.3M
Total Expenses
▼$35.3M
Total Assets
$64.4M
Total Liabilities
▼$12.6M
Net Assets
$51.8M
Officer Compensation
→$2.9M
Other Salaries
$15M
Investment Income
$2.9M
Fundraising
▼N/A
Source: USAspending.gov · Searched by organization name
Total Federal Funding
$18.3M
Awards Found
17
| Awarding Agency | Description | Amount | Fiscal Year | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Health and Human Services | MEETING 21ST CENTURY FAMILY PLANNING CHALLENGES WITH AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH 2009-2014 | $2.5M | FY2009 | Sep 2009 – Aug 2014 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | IMPROVING METHODS AND MEASURES OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH OUTCOMES | $2.5M | FY2018 | Sep 2018 – May 2024 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | GENERATING ACTIONABLE DATA TO ENSURE HIGH-QUALITY, EQUITABLE SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE - FOR FIVE DECADES, THE NATION’S PUBLICLY FUNDED FAMILY PLANNING EFFORT, WITH TITLE X AS ITS CORNERSTONE, HAS HELPED MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ACHIEVE THEIR REPRODUCTIVE GOALS, BY PROVIDING FUNDING AND GUIDELINES FOR HIGH-QUALITY, VOLUNTARY, EQUITABLE, AND ACCESSIBLE SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (SRH) SERVICES. OVER THE PAST DECADE, TITLE X HAS BEEN IN SIGNIFICANT FLUX, EXPANDING THE RANGE OF SERVICES OFFERED, CENTERING HEALTH EQUITY, NAVIGATING A SHIFTING LANDSCAPE SHAPED BY THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, AND EXPERIENCING SERVICE DISRUPTIONS DUE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND SHIFTING POLICIES AND PRIORITIES. THE GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE PROPOSES A COMPREHENSIVE PACKAGE OF RESEARCH TO GENERATE ACTIONABLE DATA AND ENSURE THAT HIGH-QUALITY, EQUITABLE SRH SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE TO ALL PEOPLE. THIS WORK ADDRESSES THREE OF OPA’S FOUR PRIORITY AREAS: (A) INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES TO INCREASE EQUITABLE ACCESS, (C) TRENDS AND CURRENT REACH OF FAMILY PLANNING CLINICS, AND (D) TRENDS IN CLIENT NEED AND USE OF TITLE X SERVICES. THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES ADDRESS INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL, PROVIDER-LEVEL AND SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUESTIONS OF HEALTH EQUITY, INCLUDING ACCESS TO AND PREFERENCES FOR QUALITY FAMILY PLANNING CARE. MULTIPLE, INTERRELATED RESEARCH FOCI, EACH RESPONDING TO AND INFORMING THE OTHER, ARE DESIGNED TO ADVANCE FOUNDATIONAL RESOURCES TO ASSESS FAMILY PLANNING CARE IN THE US. WE ALSO INCLUDE INNOVATIVE WORK TO IMPROVE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS AND WILL COLLABORATE WITH PARTNERS TO BRING IN EXPERTISE AND CENTER THE NEEDS OF PEOPLE SEEKING CARE. THIS WORK WILL RESULT IN DATA AND FINDINGS READILY AVAILABLE FOR POLICY MAKERS, CLINICAL PROVIDERS, AND PROGRAM PLANNERS TO LEVERAGE WHEN DESIGNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES TO INCREASE EQUITABLE ACCESS, ESPECIALLY FOR THOSE MOST IN NEED OF PUBLICLY FUNDED SRH SERVICES. THE INFORMATION GENERATED FROM THIS RESEARCH WILL PROVIDE NEW INSIGHTS AND ANSWERS TO FOUR KEY RESEARCH QUESTIONS. MAJOR ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR EACH RESEARCH QUESTION INCLUDE: - WHO NEEDS SRH CARE? IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. ANU MANCHIKANTI GOMEZ, WE WILL INTEGRATE A NEW METRIC OF CONTRACEPTIVE NEED BASED ON PEOPLE’S OWN DETERMINATION OF THAT NEED INTO GUTTMACHER’S ON-GOING SURVEILLANCE WORK, PRODUCING POPULATION-LEVEL ESTIMATES OF THE NUMBERS WHO MAY NEED CARE, AND THOSE WHO MAY NEED PUBLIC FUNDING FOR THIS CARE. - WHERE, FOR WHOM, AND HOW IS CARE PROVIDED AND RECEIVED? WE WILL PROVIDE DATA AND INFORMATION FOR ASSESSING THE ADEQUACY OF EXISTING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN DELIVERING EQUITABLE ACCESS TO CARE AND IN MEETING PEOPLE’S NEEDS USING THREE DATA SOURCES: THE NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH (NSFG), GUTTMACHER’S 2020 CENSUS OF PUBLICLY FUNDED CLINICS, AND GUTTMACHER’S 2022 NATIONAL SURVEY OF CLINICS PROVIDING PUBLICLY FUNDED CONTRACEPTIVE SERVICES. - WHAT CARE DO PEOPLE WANT? WE WILL CONDUCT NEW, SECONDARY ANALYSES OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DATA RECENTLY COLLECTED BY GUTTMACHER THAT WILL DRAW ON INDIVIDUALS’ SELF-REPORTED EXPERIENCES OBTAINING SRH CARE, PREFERENCES REGARDING THIS CARE, DESCRIPTIONS OF QUALITY SRH CARE, AND TRUST IN THE HEALTH SYSTEM. FINDINGS FROM THESE ANALYSES WILL ARM CLINICIANS, POLICY MAKERS, AND OTHER DECISION-MAKERS WITH THE INFORMATION NEEDED TO ALIGN SRH CARE DELIVERY WITH PATIENTS’ NEEDS AND PREFERENCES. - WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES ACCESS TO CARE MAKE? IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE COALITION TO EXPAND CONTRACEPTIVE ACCESS (CECA) AND INFORMED BY DIVERSE STAKEHOLDER INPUT THROUGH EXPERT AND PATIENT LIVED EXPERIENCE PANEL CONVENINGS, WE PROPOSE TO DEVELOP NEW APPROACHES TO MEASURE THE IMPACTS OF RECEIVING OR NOT RECEIVING DESIRED SRH CARE SO THAT THESE METRICS ARE MORE EQUITABLE AND PERSON-CENTERED. WE AIM TO DISSEMINATE DATA AND FINDINGS FROM THIS WORK WIDELY AND EFFECTIVELY. STATE AND COUNTY DATA WILL BE MADE EASILY ACCESSIBLE USING GUTTMACHER’S ONLINE DATA CENTER; OTHER REPORTS AND PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES WILL BE POSTED ON THE GUTTMACHER | $2.3M | FY2022 | Sep 2022 – Aug 2025 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | ADVANCING MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF SENSITIVE BEHAVIORS IN THE UNITED STATES | $2.1M | FY2016 | Sep 2016 – Apr 2022 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | HIV STATUS AND ACHIEVING FERTILITY DESIRES: IMPLICATIONS FOR HIV PREVENTION AND T | $1.5M | FY2008 | May 2008 – Apr 2014 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | NEED FOR, AND IMPACT OF, PUBLICLY FUNDED FAMILY PLANNING IN THE ERA OF HEALTH REFORM | $1.2M | FY2014 | Jul 2014 – Jun 2017 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | MEASURING AND EXPLAINING UNINTENDED PREGNANCY IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-2009 | $1.2M | FY2009 | Jul 2009 – Jun 2014 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | THE IMPACT OF NEW STATE RESTRICTIONS ON ABORTION INCIDENCE AND SAFETY IN THE UNITED STATES - AS A RESULT OF THE US SUPREME COURT'S JUNE 2022 DECISION IN DOBBS V. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, THE LANDSCAPE OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE IN THE UNITED STATES IS IN THE MIDST OF SEISMIC AND RAPID CHANGE. WITHIN 100 DAYS OF THE RULING, FOURTEEN STATES EITHER BANNED OR SEVERELY RESTRICTED ABORTION PROVISION; OVER THE COMING MONTHS, MANY MORE ARE LIKELY TO FOLLOW SUIT. THE ABRUPT CHANGES IN ACCESS TO ABORTION IN THE US ARE WITHOUT PRECEDENT IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE AFFECTED AND THE NUMBER OF STATES IN WHICH THERE REMAINS SUBSTANTIAL UNCERTAINTY AROUND ENACTMENT OF FURTHER RESTRICTIONS IN THE NEAR FUTURE. THIS PROJECT ADDRESSES THE URGENT NEED FOR BASELINE DATA TO CAPTURE THE IMPACT OF STATE ABORTION RESTRICTIONS EXPECTED OVER THE COMING MONTHS ON THE HEALTH OF PREGNANT PEOPLE, AS WELL AS THE NEED FOR HIGH QUALITY ESTIMATES OF ABORTION INCIDENCE BOTH WITHIN AND OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. WITHOUT THESE DATA, PRIMARY PUBLIC HEALTH INDICATORS FOR THE NATION WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE, NOR WILL POLICY MAKERS, PROGRAM DEVELOPERS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, RESEARCHERS AND THE PUBLIC HAVE THE RESEARCH-BASED EVIDENCE NEEDED TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF THESE ABORTION POLICIES NOW AND GOING FORWARD. TO ADDRESS THIS CRITICAL NEED, WE PROPOSE FOUR LINKED AIMS. STARTING IN THE FIRST MONTH OF THE R61 PHASE (AIM 1), WE WILL BEGIN DATA COLLECTION ACTIVITIES TO MEASURE CHANGE IN ABORTION WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR DURING A PERIOD OF ANTICIPATED RAPID STATE-LEVEL POLICY CHANGE. IN AIM 1A, WE WILL COLLECT DATA ON ABORTIONS OCCURRING WITHIN THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR USING A NEW AND ADAPTIVE MONTHLY ABORTION SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM, SURVEYING REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES OF HEALTH FACILITIES PROVIDING ABORTION CARE. WE WILL PRODUCE PUBLIC FACING MONTHLY ESTIMATES OF FACILITY-BASED ABORTION INCIDENCE NATIONALLY, LEVERAGING DECADES OF HISTORICAL FACILITY-LEVEL ABORTION DATA IN A BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL MODEL TO IMPROVE PRECISION. IN AIM 1B, WE WILL COLLECT DATA ON ABORTIONS OCCURRING OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SECTOR, MEASURING ABORTION-RELATED COMPLICATIONS AND THE HEALTHCARE NEEDS OF PEOPLE SELF-MANAGING ABORTIONS (SMA) BY SURVEYING SMA USERS AND PROVIDERS. DATA COLLECTED IN AIM 1 WILL BE USED IN THE R33 PHASE TO MEASURE THE IMPACT OF STATE POLICY CHANGE AND INFORM ESTIMATION OF ABORTION INCIDENCE OUTSIDE THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SECTOR. IN AIM 2, WE WILL ASSESS THE IMPACT OF STATE ABORTION RESTRICTIONS IMPLEMENTED DURING PROJECT YEAR 1 ON THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE OBTAINING FACILITY-BASED ABORTIONS AND THE GESTATIONAL AGE OF THEIR PREGNANCIES, AND THE INCIDENCE OF INTERSTATE TRAVEL TO OBTAIN FACILITY- BASED ABORTION CARE. IN AIM 3, WE WILL ADAPT A METHODOLOGY USED EXTENSIVELY OUTSIDE OF THE US TO ESTIMATE ABORTION UNDER RESTRICTIVE CONDITIONS TO ESTIMATE SELF-MANAGED ABORTION INCIDENCE OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR. FINALLY, IN AIM 4, WE WILL COMBINE DATA ON FACILITY-BASED AND SELF-MANAGED ABORTIONS TO ESTIMATE THE NATIONAL INCIDENCE OF ABORTION AND ABORTION-RELATED HEALTH OUTCOMES. | $1.2M | FY2023 | Sep 2023 – Aug 2028 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | ADVANCING RESEARCH ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF UNINTENDED CHILDBEARING | $1M | FY2011 | Sep 2011 – Aug 2015 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | FINANCIAL VIABILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY OF TITLE X CENTERS | $880K | FY2014 | Jul 2014 – Jun 2017 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | THE IMPACT OF NEW STATE RESTRICTIONS ON ABORTION INCIDENCE AND SAFETY IN THE UNITED STATES - AS A RESULT OF THE US SUPREME COURT'S JUNE 2022 DECISION IN DOBBS V. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, THE LANDSCAPE OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE IN THE UNITED STATES IS IN THE MIDST OF SEISMIC AND RAPID CHANGE. WITHIN 100 DAYS OF THE RULING, FOURTEEN STATES EITHER BANNED OR SEVERELY RESTRICTED ABORTION PROVISION; OVER THE COMING MONTHS, MANY MORE ARE LIKELY TO FOLLOW SUIT. THE ABRUPT CHANGES IN ACCESS TO ABORTION IN THE US ARE WITHOUT PRECEDENT IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE AFFECTED AND THE NUMBER OF STATES IN WHICH THERE REMAINS SUBSTANTIAL UNCERTAINTY AROUND ENACTMENT OF FURTHER RESTRICTIONS IN THE NEAR FUTURE. THIS PROJECT ADDRESSES THE URGENT NEED FOR BASELINE DATA TO CAPTURE THE IMPACT OF STATE ABORTION RESTRICTIONS EXPECTED OVER THE COMING MONTHS ON THE HEALTH OF PREGNANT PEOPLE, AS WELL AS THE NEED FOR HIGH QUALITY ESTIMATES OF ABORTION INCIDENCE BOTH WITHIN AND OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. WITHOUT THESE DATA, PRIMARY PUBLIC HEALTH INDICATORS FOR THE NATION WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE, NOR WILL POLICY MAKERS, PROGRAM DEVELOPERS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, RESEARCHERS AND THE PUBLIC HAVE THE RESEARCH-BASED EVIDENCE NEEDED TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF THESE ABORTION POLICIES NOW AND GOING FORWARD. TO ADDRESS THIS CRITICAL NEED, WE PROPOSE FOUR LINKED AIMS. STARTING IN THE FIRST MONTH OF THE R61 PHASE (AIM 1), WE WILL BEGIN DATA COLLECTION ACTIVITIES TO MEASURE CHANGE IN ABORTION WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR DURING A PERIOD OF ANTICIPATED RAPID STATE-LEVEL POLICY CHANGE. IN AIM 1A, WE WILL COLLECT DATA ON ABORTIONS OCCURRING WITHIN THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR USING A NEW AND ADAPTIVE MONTHLY ABORTION SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM, SURVEYING REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES OF HEALTH FACILITIES PROVIDING ABORTION CARE. WE WILL PRODUCE PUBLIC FACING MONTHLY ESTIMATES OF FACILITY-BASED ABORTION INCIDENCE NATIONALLY, LEVERAGING DECADES OF HISTORICAL FACILITY-LEVEL ABORTION DATA IN A BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL MODEL TO IMPROVE PRECISION. IN AIM 1B, WE WILL COLLECT DATA ON ABORTIONS OCCURRING OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SECTOR, MEASURING ABORTION-RELATED COMPLICATIONS AND THE HEALTHCARE NEEDS OF PEOPLE SELF-MANAGING ABORTIONS (SMA) BY SURVEYING SMA USERS AND PROVIDERS. DATA COLLECTED IN AIM 1 WILL BE USED IN THE R33 PHASE TO MEASURE THE IMPACT OF STATE POLICY CHANGE AND INFORM ESTIMATION OF ABORTION INCIDENCE OUTSIDE THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SECTOR. IN AIM 2, WE WILL ASSESS THE IMPACT OF STATE ABORTION RESTRICTIONS IMPLEMENTED DURING PROJECT YEAR 1 ON THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE OBTAINING FACILITY-BASED ABORTIONS AND THE GESTATIONAL AGE OF THEIR PREGNANCIES, AND THE INCIDENCE OF INTERSTATE TRAVEL TO OBTAIN FACILITY- BASED ABORTION CARE. IN AIM 3, WE WILL ADAPT A METHODOLOGY USED EXTENSIVELY OUTSIDE OF THE US TO ESTIMATE ABORTION UNDER RESTRICTIVE CONDITIONS TO ESTIMATE SELF-MANAGED ABORTION INCIDENCE OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR. FINALLY, IN AIM 4, WE WILL COMBINE DATA ON FACILITY-BASED AND SELF-MANAGED ABORTIONS TO ESTIMATE THE NATIONAL INCIDENCE OF ABORTION AND ABORTION-RELATED HEALTH OUTCOMES. | $594.2K | FY2023 | Sep 2023 – Aug 2024 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | GUTTMACHER CENTER FOR POPULATION RESEARCH INNOVATION AND DISSEMINATION | $462.4K | FY2013 | Sep 2013 – Aug 2018 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | 2007 FAMILY PLANNING SERVICE DELIVERY IMPROVEMENT RESEARCH | $345.9K | FY2007 | Sep 2007 – Sep 2010 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | FAMILY PLANNING NEEDS AND SERVICES IN THE US | $250K | FY2004 | Sep 2004 – Sep 2009 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | PUBLIC USE DATASETS FOR FERTILITY AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH | $121K | FY2017 | Apr 2017 – Mar 2019 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | PUBLIC USE DATASETS FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH | $119.5K | FY2020 | Jan 2020 – Dec 2021 |
| Department of Health and Human Services | MCH RESEARCH | $99.9K | FY2013 | Feb 2013 – Jan 2014 |
Department of Health and Human Services
$2.5M
MEETING 21ST CENTURY FAMILY PLANNING CHALLENGES WITH AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH 2009-2014
Department of Health and Human Services
$2.5M
IMPROVING METHODS AND MEASURES OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH OUTCOMES
Department of Health and Human Services
$2.3M
GENERATING ACTIONABLE DATA TO ENSURE HIGH-QUALITY, EQUITABLE SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE - FOR FIVE DECADES, THE NATION’S PUBLICLY FUNDED FAMILY PLANNING EFFORT, WITH TITLE X AS ITS CORNERSTONE, HAS HELPED MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ACHIEVE THEIR REPRODUCTIVE GOALS, BY PROVIDING FUNDING AND GUIDELINES FOR HIGH-QUALITY, VOLUNTARY, EQUITABLE, AND ACCESSIBLE SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (SRH) SERVICES. OVER THE PAST DECADE, TITLE X HAS BEEN IN SIGNIFICANT FLUX, EXPANDING THE RANGE OF SERVICES OFFERED, CENTERING HEALTH EQUITY, NAVIGATING A SHIFTING LANDSCAPE SHAPED BY THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, AND EXPERIENCING SERVICE DISRUPTIONS DUE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND SHIFTING POLICIES AND PRIORITIES. THE GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE PROPOSES A COMPREHENSIVE PACKAGE OF RESEARCH TO GENERATE ACTIONABLE DATA AND ENSURE THAT HIGH-QUALITY, EQUITABLE SRH SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE TO ALL PEOPLE. THIS WORK ADDRESSES THREE OF OPA’S FOUR PRIORITY AREAS: (A) INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES TO INCREASE EQUITABLE ACCESS, (C) TRENDS AND CURRENT REACH OF FAMILY PLANNING CLINICS, AND (D) TRENDS IN CLIENT NEED AND USE OF TITLE X SERVICES. THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES ADDRESS INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL, PROVIDER-LEVEL AND SYSTEMS-LEVEL QUESTIONS OF HEALTH EQUITY, INCLUDING ACCESS TO AND PREFERENCES FOR QUALITY FAMILY PLANNING CARE. MULTIPLE, INTERRELATED RESEARCH FOCI, EACH RESPONDING TO AND INFORMING THE OTHER, ARE DESIGNED TO ADVANCE FOUNDATIONAL RESOURCES TO ASSESS FAMILY PLANNING CARE IN THE US. WE ALSO INCLUDE INNOVATIVE WORK TO IMPROVE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS AND WILL COLLABORATE WITH PARTNERS TO BRING IN EXPERTISE AND CENTER THE NEEDS OF PEOPLE SEEKING CARE. THIS WORK WILL RESULT IN DATA AND FINDINGS READILY AVAILABLE FOR POLICY MAKERS, CLINICAL PROVIDERS, AND PROGRAM PLANNERS TO LEVERAGE WHEN DESIGNING PROGRAMS AND POLICIES TO INCREASE EQUITABLE ACCESS, ESPECIALLY FOR THOSE MOST IN NEED OF PUBLICLY FUNDED SRH SERVICES. THE INFORMATION GENERATED FROM THIS RESEARCH WILL PROVIDE NEW INSIGHTS AND ANSWERS TO FOUR KEY RESEARCH QUESTIONS. MAJOR ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR EACH RESEARCH QUESTION INCLUDE: - WHO NEEDS SRH CARE? IN COLLABORATION WITH DR. ANU MANCHIKANTI GOMEZ, WE WILL INTEGRATE A NEW METRIC OF CONTRACEPTIVE NEED BASED ON PEOPLE’S OWN DETERMINATION OF THAT NEED INTO GUTTMACHER’S ON-GOING SURVEILLANCE WORK, PRODUCING POPULATION-LEVEL ESTIMATES OF THE NUMBERS WHO MAY NEED CARE, AND THOSE WHO MAY NEED PUBLIC FUNDING FOR THIS CARE. - WHERE, FOR WHOM, AND HOW IS CARE PROVIDED AND RECEIVED? WE WILL PROVIDE DATA AND INFORMATION FOR ASSESSING THE ADEQUACY OF EXISTING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN DELIVERING EQUITABLE ACCESS TO CARE AND IN MEETING PEOPLE’S NEEDS USING THREE DATA SOURCES: THE NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH (NSFG), GUTTMACHER’S 2020 CENSUS OF PUBLICLY FUNDED CLINICS, AND GUTTMACHER’S 2022 NATIONAL SURVEY OF CLINICS PROVIDING PUBLICLY FUNDED CONTRACEPTIVE SERVICES. - WHAT CARE DO PEOPLE WANT? WE WILL CONDUCT NEW, SECONDARY ANALYSES OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DATA RECENTLY COLLECTED BY GUTTMACHER THAT WILL DRAW ON INDIVIDUALS’ SELF-REPORTED EXPERIENCES OBTAINING SRH CARE, PREFERENCES REGARDING THIS CARE, DESCRIPTIONS OF QUALITY SRH CARE, AND TRUST IN THE HEALTH SYSTEM. FINDINGS FROM THESE ANALYSES WILL ARM CLINICIANS, POLICY MAKERS, AND OTHER DECISION-MAKERS WITH THE INFORMATION NEEDED TO ALIGN SRH CARE DELIVERY WITH PATIENTS’ NEEDS AND PREFERENCES. - WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES ACCESS TO CARE MAKE? IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE COALITION TO EXPAND CONTRACEPTIVE ACCESS (CECA) AND INFORMED BY DIVERSE STAKEHOLDER INPUT THROUGH EXPERT AND PATIENT LIVED EXPERIENCE PANEL CONVENINGS, WE PROPOSE TO DEVELOP NEW APPROACHES TO MEASURE THE IMPACTS OF RECEIVING OR NOT RECEIVING DESIRED SRH CARE SO THAT THESE METRICS ARE MORE EQUITABLE AND PERSON-CENTERED. WE AIM TO DISSEMINATE DATA AND FINDINGS FROM THIS WORK WIDELY AND EFFECTIVELY. STATE AND COUNTY DATA WILL BE MADE EASILY ACCESSIBLE USING GUTTMACHER’S ONLINE DATA CENTER; OTHER REPORTS AND PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES WILL BE POSTED ON THE GUTTMACHER
Department of Health and Human Services
$2.1M
ADVANCING MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF SENSITIVE BEHAVIORS IN THE UNITED STATES
Department of Health and Human Services
$1.5M
HIV STATUS AND ACHIEVING FERTILITY DESIRES: IMPLICATIONS FOR HIV PREVENTION AND T
Department of Health and Human Services
$1.2M
NEED FOR, AND IMPACT OF, PUBLICLY FUNDED FAMILY PLANNING IN THE ERA OF HEALTH REFORM
Department of Health and Human Services
$1.2M
MEASURING AND EXPLAINING UNINTENDED PREGNANCY IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-2009
Department of Health and Human Services
$1.2M
THE IMPACT OF NEW STATE RESTRICTIONS ON ABORTION INCIDENCE AND SAFETY IN THE UNITED STATES - AS A RESULT OF THE US SUPREME COURT'S JUNE 2022 DECISION IN DOBBS V. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, THE LANDSCAPE OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE IN THE UNITED STATES IS IN THE MIDST OF SEISMIC AND RAPID CHANGE. WITHIN 100 DAYS OF THE RULING, FOURTEEN STATES EITHER BANNED OR SEVERELY RESTRICTED ABORTION PROVISION; OVER THE COMING MONTHS, MANY MORE ARE LIKELY TO FOLLOW SUIT. THE ABRUPT CHANGES IN ACCESS TO ABORTION IN THE US ARE WITHOUT PRECEDENT IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE AFFECTED AND THE NUMBER OF STATES IN WHICH THERE REMAINS SUBSTANTIAL UNCERTAINTY AROUND ENACTMENT OF FURTHER RESTRICTIONS IN THE NEAR FUTURE. THIS PROJECT ADDRESSES THE URGENT NEED FOR BASELINE DATA TO CAPTURE THE IMPACT OF STATE ABORTION RESTRICTIONS EXPECTED OVER THE COMING MONTHS ON THE HEALTH OF PREGNANT PEOPLE, AS WELL AS THE NEED FOR HIGH QUALITY ESTIMATES OF ABORTION INCIDENCE BOTH WITHIN AND OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. WITHOUT THESE DATA, PRIMARY PUBLIC HEALTH INDICATORS FOR THE NATION WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE, NOR WILL POLICY MAKERS, PROGRAM DEVELOPERS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, RESEARCHERS AND THE PUBLIC HAVE THE RESEARCH-BASED EVIDENCE NEEDED TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF THESE ABORTION POLICIES NOW AND GOING FORWARD. TO ADDRESS THIS CRITICAL NEED, WE PROPOSE FOUR LINKED AIMS. STARTING IN THE FIRST MONTH OF THE R61 PHASE (AIM 1), WE WILL BEGIN DATA COLLECTION ACTIVITIES TO MEASURE CHANGE IN ABORTION WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR DURING A PERIOD OF ANTICIPATED RAPID STATE-LEVEL POLICY CHANGE. IN AIM 1A, WE WILL COLLECT DATA ON ABORTIONS OCCURRING WITHIN THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR USING A NEW AND ADAPTIVE MONTHLY ABORTION SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM, SURVEYING REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES OF HEALTH FACILITIES PROVIDING ABORTION CARE. WE WILL PRODUCE PUBLIC FACING MONTHLY ESTIMATES OF FACILITY-BASED ABORTION INCIDENCE NATIONALLY, LEVERAGING DECADES OF HISTORICAL FACILITY-LEVEL ABORTION DATA IN A BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL MODEL TO IMPROVE PRECISION. IN AIM 1B, WE WILL COLLECT DATA ON ABORTIONS OCCURRING OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SECTOR, MEASURING ABORTION-RELATED COMPLICATIONS AND THE HEALTHCARE NEEDS OF PEOPLE SELF-MANAGING ABORTIONS (SMA) BY SURVEYING SMA USERS AND PROVIDERS. DATA COLLECTED IN AIM 1 WILL BE USED IN THE R33 PHASE TO MEASURE THE IMPACT OF STATE POLICY CHANGE AND INFORM ESTIMATION OF ABORTION INCIDENCE OUTSIDE THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SECTOR. IN AIM 2, WE WILL ASSESS THE IMPACT OF STATE ABORTION RESTRICTIONS IMPLEMENTED DURING PROJECT YEAR 1 ON THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE OBTAINING FACILITY-BASED ABORTIONS AND THE GESTATIONAL AGE OF THEIR PREGNANCIES, AND THE INCIDENCE OF INTERSTATE TRAVEL TO OBTAIN FACILITY- BASED ABORTION CARE. IN AIM 3, WE WILL ADAPT A METHODOLOGY USED EXTENSIVELY OUTSIDE OF THE US TO ESTIMATE ABORTION UNDER RESTRICTIVE CONDITIONS TO ESTIMATE SELF-MANAGED ABORTION INCIDENCE OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR. FINALLY, IN AIM 4, WE WILL COMBINE DATA ON FACILITY-BASED AND SELF-MANAGED ABORTIONS TO ESTIMATE THE NATIONAL INCIDENCE OF ABORTION AND ABORTION-RELATED HEALTH OUTCOMES.
Department of Health and Human Services
$1M
ADVANCING RESEARCH ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF UNINTENDED CHILDBEARING
Department of Health and Human Services
$880K
FINANCIAL VIABILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY OF TITLE X CENTERS
Department of Health and Human Services
$594.2K
THE IMPACT OF NEW STATE RESTRICTIONS ON ABORTION INCIDENCE AND SAFETY IN THE UNITED STATES - AS A RESULT OF THE US SUPREME COURT'S JUNE 2022 DECISION IN DOBBS V. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, THE LANDSCAPE OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE IN THE UNITED STATES IS IN THE MIDST OF SEISMIC AND RAPID CHANGE. WITHIN 100 DAYS OF THE RULING, FOURTEEN STATES EITHER BANNED OR SEVERELY RESTRICTED ABORTION PROVISION; OVER THE COMING MONTHS, MANY MORE ARE LIKELY TO FOLLOW SUIT. THE ABRUPT CHANGES IN ACCESS TO ABORTION IN THE US ARE WITHOUT PRECEDENT IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE AFFECTED AND THE NUMBER OF STATES IN WHICH THERE REMAINS SUBSTANTIAL UNCERTAINTY AROUND ENACTMENT OF FURTHER RESTRICTIONS IN THE NEAR FUTURE. THIS PROJECT ADDRESSES THE URGENT NEED FOR BASELINE DATA TO CAPTURE THE IMPACT OF STATE ABORTION RESTRICTIONS EXPECTED OVER THE COMING MONTHS ON THE HEALTH OF PREGNANT PEOPLE, AS WELL AS THE NEED FOR HIGH QUALITY ESTIMATES OF ABORTION INCIDENCE BOTH WITHIN AND OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. WITHOUT THESE DATA, PRIMARY PUBLIC HEALTH INDICATORS FOR THE NATION WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE, NOR WILL POLICY MAKERS, PROGRAM DEVELOPERS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, RESEARCHERS AND THE PUBLIC HAVE THE RESEARCH-BASED EVIDENCE NEEDED TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF THESE ABORTION POLICIES NOW AND GOING FORWARD. TO ADDRESS THIS CRITICAL NEED, WE PROPOSE FOUR LINKED AIMS. STARTING IN THE FIRST MONTH OF THE R61 PHASE (AIM 1), WE WILL BEGIN DATA COLLECTION ACTIVITIES TO MEASURE CHANGE IN ABORTION WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR DURING A PERIOD OF ANTICIPATED RAPID STATE-LEVEL POLICY CHANGE. IN AIM 1A, WE WILL COLLECT DATA ON ABORTIONS OCCURRING WITHIN THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR USING A NEW AND ADAPTIVE MONTHLY ABORTION SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM, SURVEYING REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES OF HEALTH FACILITIES PROVIDING ABORTION CARE. WE WILL PRODUCE PUBLIC FACING MONTHLY ESTIMATES OF FACILITY-BASED ABORTION INCIDENCE NATIONALLY, LEVERAGING DECADES OF HISTORICAL FACILITY-LEVEL ABORTION DATA IN A BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL MODEL TO IMPROVE PRECISION. IN AIM 1B, WE WILL COLLECT DATA ON ABORTIONS OCCURRING OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SECTOR, MEASURING ABORTION-RELATED COMPLICATIONS AND THE HEALTHCARE NEEDS OF PEOPLE SELF-MANAGING ABORTIONS (SMA) BY SURVEYING SMA USERS AND PROVIDERS. DATA COLLECTED IN AIM 1 WILL BE USED IN THE R33 PHASE TO MEASURE THE IMPACT OF STATE POLICY CHANGE AND INFORM ESTIMATION OF ABORTION INCIDENCE OUTSIDE THE FORMAL HEALTH CARE SECTOR. IN AIM 2, WE WILL ASSESS THE IMPACT OF STATE ABORTION RESTRICTIONS IMPLEMENTED DURING PROJECT YEAR 1 ON THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE OBTAINING FACILITY-BASED ABORTIONS AND THE GESTATIONAL AGE OF THEIR PREGNANCIES, AND THE INCIDENCE OF INTERSTATE TRAVEL TO OBTAIN FACILITY- BASED ABORTION CARE. IN AIM 3, WE WILL ADAPT A METHODOLOGY USED EXTENSIVELY OUTSIDE OF THE US TO ESTIMATE ABORTION UNDER RESTRICTIVE CONDITIONS TO ESTIMATE SELF-MANAGED ABORTION INCIDENCE OUTSIDE OF THE FORMAL HEALTH SECTOR. FINALLY, IN AIM 4, WE WILL COMBINE DATA ON FACILITY-BASED AND SELF-MANAGED ABORTIONS TO ESTIMATE THE NATIONAL INCIDENCE OF ABORTION AND ABORTION-RELATED HEALTH OUTCOMES.
Department of Health and Human Services
$462.4K
GUTTMACHER CENTER FOR POPULATION RESEARCH INNOVATION AND DISSEMINATION
Department of Health and Human Services
$345.9K
2007 FAMILY PLANNING SERVICE DELIVERY IMPROVEMENT RESEARCH
Department of Health and Human Services
$250K
FAMILY PLANNING NEEDS AND SERVICES IN THE US
Department of Health and Human Services
$121K
PUBLIC USE DATASETS FOR FERTILITY AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH
Department of Health and Human Services
$119.5K
PUBLIC USE DATASETS FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH
Department of Health and Human Services
$99.9K
MCH RESEARCH
Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (fac.gov)
No federal single audit records found for this organization.
Single audits are required for entities expending $750,000+ in federal awards annually.
Tax Year 2024 · Source: IRS e-Filed Form 990
Individuals serving as officers, directors, or trustees of the organization.
| Name | Title | Hrs/Wk | Compensation | Related Orgs | Other |
|---|
Source: IRS Publication 78, Auto-Revocation List & e-Postcard Data
Tax-deductible contributions: Yes
Deductibility code: PC
Sources: IRS e-Filed Form 990 (XML) & ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Scroll →
| Year | Revenue | Contributions | Expenses | Assets | Net Assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024IRS e-File | $26.5M | $23.3M | $35.3M | $64.4M | $51.8M |
| 2023 | $27.9M | $25.9M | $31.9M | $73.2M | $59.5M |
| 2022 | $33M | $32.4M | $27.8M | $76M | $61.1M |
| 2021 | $37.5M | $33.7M |
Sources: ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer & IRS e-File Index
| Tax Year | Form Type | Source | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 990 | IRS e-File | PDF not yet published by IRSView Filing → |
| 2023 | 990 | DataIRS e-File | PDF not yet published by IRSView Filing → |
| 2022 | 990 | DataIRS e-File |
Financial data: IRS e-Filed Form 990 (Tax Year 2024)
Leadership & compensation: IRS e-Filed Form 990, Part VII (Tax Year 2024)
Federal grants: USAspending.gov (live)
Organization info: IRS Business Master File
Tax-deductibility: IRS Publication 78
| Total |
|---|
| Susheela Singh | Distinguished Scholar & VP | 35 | $375.9K | $0 | $83.7K | $459.7K |
| Jonathan Wittenberg | Acting CEO | 35 | $373.9K | $0 | $84.3K | $458.3K |
| Maureen Burnley | VP For Finance & Admin. | 35 | $286.6K | $0 | $66.8K | $353.4K |
| Wendy Sealey | Vice President For Development | 35 | $278.3K | $0 | $74.5K | $352.8K |
| Maibe Ponet | VP For Communications | 35 | $270.5K | $0 | $80.2K | $350.7K |
| Destiny Lopez | Acting CEO | 35 | $325.3K | $0 | $14.4K | $339.7K |
| Kelly Baden | VP For Public Policy | 35 | $283.6K | $0 | $39K | $322.6K |
| Aletha Akers | VP For Research (thru 09/24) | 35 | $269.8K | $0 | $21.6K | $291.4K |
| Caroline Greene | Treasurer | 0.9 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mugdha Mokashi | Secretary | 0.7 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Pamela Merritt | Immediate Past Chair | 1.2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Wendy Bostwick | Board Chair | 0.8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Susheela Singh
Distinguished Scholar & VP
$459.7K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$375.9K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$83.7K
Jonathan Wittenberg
Acting CEO
$458.3K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$373.9K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$84.3K
Maureen Burnley
VP For Finance & Admin.
$353.4K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$286.6K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$66.8K
Wendy Sealey
Vice President For Development
$352.8K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$278.3K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$74.5K
Maibe Ponet
VP For Communications
$350.7K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$270.5K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$80.2K
Destiny Lopez
Acting CEO
$339.7K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$325.3K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$14.4K
Kelly Baden
VP For Public Policy
$322.6K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$283.6K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$39K
Aletha Akers
VP For Research (thru 09/24)
$291.4K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$269.8K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$21.6K
Caroline Greene
Treasurer
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.9
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Mugdha Mokashi
Secretary
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.7
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Pamela Merritt
Immediate Past Chair
$0
Hrs/Wk
1.2
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Wendy Bostwick
Board Chair
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.8
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Highest compensated employees who are not officers or directors.
| Name | Title | Hrs/Wk | Compensation | Related Orgs | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathryn Kost | Director Of Domestic Research | 35 | $271.3K | $0 | $79.4K | $350.7K |
| Kathleen Randall | Director Of Production | 35 | $248.5K | $0 | $62.8K | $311.3K |
| Onikepe Owolabi | Director Of International Research | 35 | $227.3K | $0 | $69.6K | $296.9K |
| Jennifer Frost | Principal Research Scientist | 35 | $243.5K | $0 | $37.2K | $280.8K |
| Rachel Jones | Principal Research Scientist | 35 | $227.7K | $0 | $39.1K | $266.8K |
Kathryn Kost
Director Of Domestic Research
$350.7K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$271.3K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$79.4K
Kathleen Randall
Director Of Production
$311.3K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$248.5K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$62.8K
Onikepe Owolabi
Director Of International Research
$296.9K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$227.3K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$69.6K
Members of the governing board. Board members often serve without compensation.
| Name | Title | Hrs/Wk | Compensation | Related Orgs | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Ezeh | Board Member | 0.9 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Allana Welch | Chair Of Audit Committee | 0.7 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Barbara Singhaus | Board Member (thru 06/24) | 0.7 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Benjamin Kahrl | Board Member (thru 06/24) | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Beth Fredrick | Board Member | 0.2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Carolyn Florey | Board Member |
Alex Ezeh
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.9
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Allana Welch
Chair Of Audit Committee
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.7
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Barbara Singhaus
Board Member (thru 06/24)
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.7
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
| $26.9M |
| $76.9M |
| $60.2M |
| 2020 | $19.3M | $18M | $27.7M | $71.8M | $50.6M |
| 2019 | $19.2M | $17.4M | $28.4M | $67.8M | $57.4M |
| 2018 | $11.2M | $9.9M | $28.8M | $75.3M | $64.2M |
| 2017 | $63.3M | $62.2M | $24.6M | $94.3M | $83.6M |
| 2016 | $24M | $23.5M | $22.9M | $53.2M | $42.3M |
| 2015 | $18.8M | $18.1M | $19.3M | $53.6M | $42.5M |
| 2014 | $16.6M | $16.1M | $17.4M | $55.1M | $43.6M |
| 2013 | $22.2M | $21.7M | $16.3M | $55.4M | $44M |
| 2012 | $21.9M | $21.9M | $15.3M | $47.7M | $36.3M |
| 2011 | $19.1M | $19.2M | $13.6M | $40.2M | $28.7M |
PDF not yet published by IRSView Filing → |
| 2021 | 990 | Data |
| 2020 | 990 | Data | PDF not yet published by IRS |
| 2019 | 990 | Data |
| 2018 | 990 | Data |
| 2017 | 990 | Data |
| 2016 | 990 | Data |
| 2015 | 990 | Data |
| 2014 | 990 | Data |
| 2013 | 990 | Data |
| 2012 | 990 | Data |
| 2011 | 990 | Data |
| 2010 | 990 | — |
| 2009 | 990 | — |
| 2008 | 990 | — |
| 2007 | 990 | — |
| 2006 | 990 | — |
| 2005 | 990 | — |
| 2004 | 990 | — |
| 2003 | 990 | — |
| 2002 | 990 | — |
| 2001 | 990 | — |
Jennifer Frost
Principal Research Scientist
$280.8K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$243.5K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$37.2K
Rachel Jones
Principal Research Scientist
$266.8K
Hrs/Wk
35
Compensation
$227.7K
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$39.1K
| 0.2 |
| $0 |
| $0 |
| $0 |
| $0 |
| Debra Fine | Board Member | 0.8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Ernestina Coast | Board Member (thru 06/24) | 0.6 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Fajer Saeed Ebrahim | Chair Of Development Committee | 0.8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Faysal El Kak | Board Member | 0.2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Gail Baity | Member At Large | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Jessica Pinkney Gil | Chair, Nominating & Governance | 0.8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Kelli Murray | Board Member | 0.7 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Laura Philips | Board Member (thru 06/24) | 0.6 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Lida Coleman | Board Member (thru 06/24) | 0.3 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Lilian Abracinskas | Board Member | 0.5 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Lubna Bhayani | Board Member | 0.2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Melissa Murray | Board Member (thru 06/24) | — | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Michael Klein | Board Member (thru 06/24) | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Nozer Sheriar | Member At Large | 0.8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Pamela Schneider | Board Member | 0.2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Paula Avila-Guillen | Board Member | 0.2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Sabaratnam Arulkumaran | Board Member | 0.6 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Susan Ekberg Stiritz | Board Member | 0.2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Susan Frelich Appleton | Board Member | 0.7 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Tracie Gregory Goffe | Board Member | 0.2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Benjamin Kahrl
Board Member (thru 06/24)
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.5
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Beth Fredrick
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.2
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Carolyn Florey
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.2
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Debra Fine
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.8
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Ernestina Coast
Board Member (thru 06/24)
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.6
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Fajer Saeed Ebrahim
Chair Of Development Committee
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.8
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Faysal El Kak
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.2
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Gail Baity
Member At Large
$0
Hrs/Wk
1
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Jessica Pinkney Gil
Chair, Nominating & Governance
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.8
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Kelli Murray
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.7
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Laura Philips
Board Member (thru 06/24)
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.6
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Lida Coleman
Board Member (thru 06/24)
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.3
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Lilian Abracinskas
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.5
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Lubna Bhayani
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.2
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Melissa Murray
Board Member (thru 06/24)
$0
Hrs/Wk
—
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Michael Klein
Board Member (thru 06/24)
$0
Hrs/Wk
1
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Nozer Sheriar
Member At Large
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.8
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Pamela Schneider
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.2
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Paula Avila-Guillen
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.2
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Sabaratnam Arulkumaran
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.6
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Susan Ekberg Stiritz
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.2
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Susan Frelich Appleton
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.7
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0
Tracie Gregory Goffe
Board Member
$0
Hrs/Wk
0.2
Compensation
$0
Related Orgs
$0
Other
$0