Crosswind

TRANSITIONAL LIVING PROGRAM

TLP

BASIC CENTER PROGRAM

CROSSWINDS TRANSITIONAL LIVING PROGRAM

BASIC CENTER PROGRAM

BASIC CENTER PROGRAM

BASIC CENTER PROGRAM

BASIC CENTER PROGRAM

THE BASIC CENTER PROGRAM

STREET OUTREACH PROGRAM

CROSSWINDS STREET OUTREACH PROGRAM

STREET OUTREACH PROGRAMS

STREET OUTREACH PROGRAM

CONSERVING CONNECTIVITY IS FUNDAMENTAL TO SPECIES PERSISTENCE, YET RARELY IS MADE ACTIONABLE INTO SPATIAL PLANNING FOR IMPERILED SPECIES CLIMATE CHANGE AND HABITAT DEGRADATION HAVE ADDED URGENCY TO INCORPORATE CONNECTIVITY INTO CONSERVATION PLANNING, PARTICULARLY INTO NETWORKS OF PROTECTED AREAS IDENTIFYING LANDSCAPES WITH THE GREATEST CONTRIBUTION TO CONNECTIVITY, AND THEREFORE OF THE GREATEST PRIORITY FOR CONSERVATION IS PARAMOUNT TO ACTIONABLE MANAGEMENT WE WILL INCORPORATE BOTH CONNECTIVITY AMONG CORE SAGEBRUSH AREAS AND WILDFIRE THREAT TO CORE SAGEBRUSH AREAS INTO THE WAFWA SAGEBRUSH CONSERVATION DESIGN CROSSWINDS ECOLOGICAL CONSULTING LLC WILL CREATE SPATIAL ACTION MAPS THAT IDENTIFY AREAS OF GREATEST FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN CONSERVATION LANDSCAPES E G , SAGEBRUSH CORE AREAS AND OR PRIORITY AREAS FOR CONSERVATION BASED ON A PRIORITIZED CONNECTIVITY MAP EMPIRICALLY DERIVED FROM FOUNDATIONAL MODELS OF FUNCTIONAL AND NETWORK CONNECTIVITY THESE HIGHEST PRIORITY CONNECTIVITY LANDSCAPES MAY SERVE TO IDENTIFY A STRONGHOLDS WITHIN CONSERVATION AREAS TO DEFEND AGAINST THREATS AND B GROWTH OPPORTUNITY AREAS THAT SERVE TO CONNECT THE SAGEBRUSH BIOME WITHIN THE HIGHEST PRIORITY CONNECTIVITY LANDSCAPES, WE WILL CREATE SPATIAL ACTION MAPS THAT IDENTIFY WHERE THREATS E G , CONIFER ENCROACHMENT AND AGRICULTURAL CONVERSION EXCEED EMPIRICAL THRESHOLDS TO CONNECTIVITY FOR TARGETED THREAT MITIGATION WITH MAXIMIZED CONSERVATION RETURN THESE AREAS WILL BE USED TO IDENTIFY CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITY AREAS WITHIN WHICH TO PRIORITIZE RIPARIAN RESTORATION AND PROTECTION, AS WELL AS TO FOCUS INVASIVE ANNUAL GRASS AND CONIFER TREATMENTS

WE WILL USE THREE EXISTING DATA PRODUCTS PRODUCED BY THIS PROJECTS INVESTIGATORS. FIRST, WE WILL USE DR. REINHARDTS CONIFER PRIORITIZATION AND SIMULATED CONIFER TREATMENT SPATIAL DATASETS. BASED ON CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE CONIFER COVER, INVASIVE ANNUAL GRASS (IAG) RISK, AND OTHER FACTORS, THE RESULTANT MAPS CHARACTERIZE WHERE THE MANAGEMENT OF CONIFER ENCROACHMENT WOULD YIELD THE GREATEST CONSERVATION BENEFIT. WE WILL FURTHER REFINE THIS DATASET WITH UPDATED CONIFER EXPANSION ESTIMATES PROVIDED BY DR. SCOTT MORFORD (UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA). SECOND, WE WILL USE DR. CROSS GREATER SAGE-GROUSE NETWORK-PRIORITIZED FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY CUMULATIVE CURRENT MAP (CROSS ET AL. 2023A, 2023B). THIS MAP SPATIALLY DEPICTS THE MAGNITUDE OF GENE FLOW AMONG NETWORK-CONNECTED NODES (BREEDING GROUND- LEK -CLUSTERS) AND CAN BE USED TO IDENTIFY WHERE ACTIONS TO MAINTAIN AND RESTORE PRIORITY FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY FOR SAGE-GROUSE SHOULD BE OF GREATEST BENEFIT TO RANGE-WIDE CONNECTIVITY. THIRD, WE WILL LEVERAGE THE RECENTLY-PRODUCED STRUCTURAL CONNECTIVITY MODEL BASED ON THE REVISED AND UPDATED SAGEBRUSH ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY (SEI) PRODUCED BY THEOBALD ET AL. (IN REVIEW). THESE MAPS IDENTIFY THE MOST INTACT SAGEBRUSH ECOSYSTEM ACCOUNTING FOR STABILITY THROUGH TIME. WE PROPOSE THE INTEGRATION OF THESE THREE PRODUCTS TO IDENTIFY AREAS WHERE CONIFER MITIGATION WOULD MOST BENEFIT FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY FOR SAGEBRUSH OBLIGATES (UNDER THE UMBRELLA OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE), AND THAT SHOULD PRESERVE THE LANDSCAPES FOSTERING THE GREATEST STRUCTURAL CONNECTIVITY FOR ALL SAGEBRUSH RELIANT SPECIES. MITIGATION IN THESE AREAS SHOULD RESULT IN BOTH NO REGRETS AND HIGH CONSERVATION IMPACT OUTCOMES: NO REGRETS IN THAT THERE EXISTS BOTH LOW IAG THREAT, AND LOW EXPECTED IAG VULNERABILITY FOLLOWING CONIFER MITIGATION, AS WELL AS HIGH CONSERVATION IMPACT IN THAT THERE WILL BE BOTH FUNCTIONAL AND STRUCTURAL CONNECTIVITY BENEFITS IN HIGH-CONNECTIVITY LANDSCAPES. WE PROPOSE ASSESSING HOW POTENTIAL CONIFER MANAGEMENT ACTIONS WILL AFFECT CONNECTIVITY WITH A THREE-PRONGED APPROACH: (1) IDENTIFYING AREAS THAT HAVE LOST CONNECTIVITY BUT THAT WHICH COULD BE RESTORED VIA MANAGEMENT ACTIONS. WE TERM THIS CLASS OF AREAS RESTORE. (2) IDENTIFYING AREAS AT RISK OF LOSING CONNECTIVITY, BUT WHERE THE LOSS COULD BE PREVENTED VIA MANAGEMENT ACTIONS. WE TERM THIS CLASS OF AREAS PREVENT. (3) IDENTIFYING WHERE THESE RESTORE AND PREVENT LANDSCAPES ALIGN WITH CORE SAGEBRUSH AREAS, GROWTH OPPORTUNITY AREAS, AND OTHER RANGELAND AREAS AS DEFINED USING SEI WITHIN THE SCD.

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

HOMELESS ASSISTANCE

HOMELESS ASSISTANCE

HOMELESS ASSISTANCE

HOMELESS ASSISTANCE

HOMELESS ASSISTANCE

HOMELESS ASSISTANCE

HOMELESS ASSISTANCE

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM

SEC 9007 REAP-RENEW ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVE GRANTS, $20,000 OR LESS (MAN)