Loading organization details...
Loading organization details...
AURORA HEALTH CARE IS AN INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
Source: IRS Form 990 (Tax Year 2024)
Source: IRS Form 990 via ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Total Revenue
▼$258.2M
Total Contributions
$7.3M
Total Expenses
▼$418.1M
Total Assets
$3.9B
Total Liabilities
▼$6B
Net Assets
-$2.1B
Officer Compensation
→$0
Other Salaries
$89.6M
Investment Income
▼$165.9M
Fundraising
▼$0
Source: USAspending.gov · Searched by organization name
VA/DoD Awards
$3.1M
VA/DoD Award Count
1
Funding from the Department of Veterans Affairs and/or Department of Defense.
Total Federal Funding
$26.8M
Awards Found
6
Department of Health and Human Services
$17.6M
NCI COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM (NCORP) - COMMUNITY SITES
Department of Defense
$3.1M
THE IMPACT OF ELECTRONIC KNOWLEDGE-BASED NURSING CONTENT AND DECISION-SUPPORT ON NURSING-SENSITIVE PATIENT OUTCOMES
Department of Health and Human Services
$2.3M
MITOCHONDRIAL DYSFUNCTION AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN THE ELDERL
Department of Health and Human Services
$1.6M
HUMAN SENESCENCE AND CARDIOPROTECTION
Department of Health and Human Services
$1.4M
LEVERAGING PREGNANT PEOPLE-INFANT LINKAGES FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS IN THE LARGEST INTEGRATED MIDWESTERN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM TO IMPROVE LONG-TERM SURVEILLANCE OF PUBLIC HEALTH THREATS
Department of Health and Human Services
$762.6K
A NOVEL, SEMI-AUTOMATED SELF-MONITORING FEEDBACK SYSTEM FOR HEALTH PROMOTION IN COMMUNITY SETTINGS - PROJECT SUMMARY WEIGHT MANAGEMENT INTERVENTIONS DELIVERED IN COMMUNITY SETTINGS DEMONSTRATE WEIGHT LOSSES OF ~4% OF BASELINE WEIGHT, SMALLER THAN THE 8-10% OBSERVED IN EFFECTIVENESS TRIALS. THE PROVISION OF WEEKLY FEEDBACK RELATED TO SELF-MONITORING OF DIETARY INTAKE, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, AND WEIGHT IMPROVES WEIGHT LOSS OUTCOMES IN ADULTS WITH OBESITY; HOWEVER, THIS FEEDBACK IS OFTEN NOT PROVIDED IN INTERVENTIONS DELIVERED IN COMMUNITY SETTINGS DUE TO LACK OF TRAINING AND TIME. TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK PROVISION IN COMMUNITY INTERVENTIONS, WE PROPOSE TO DEVELOP A SEMI-AUTOMATED SELF-MONITORING FEEDBACK SYSTEM THAT CAN BE INTEGRATED INTO A RANGE OF COMMUNITY SETTINGS. FIRST, TO ADDRESS THE LACK OF EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE REGARDING OPTIMAL FEEDBACK CONSTRUCTION, AIM 1 WILL FOCUS ON OPTIMIZING THE EFFICACY OF FEEDBACK MESSAGES (INCLUDING DEVELOPMENT OF A FEEDBACK LIBRARY AND AN OPTIMIZED ALGORITHM FOR FEEDBACK PROVISION). IN STUDY 1, WE PROPOSE TO USE A HIGHLY EFFICIENT MICRO- RANDOMIZED FACTORIAL TRIAL DESIGN TO EVALUATE THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENT TYPES (IN RELATION TO BEHAVIORAL TARGET AND INTERACTIVITY) AND AMOUNT OF FEEDBACK ON WEIGHT CHANGE IN 300 ADULTS WITH OVERWEIGHT OR OBESITY. PARTICIPANTS IN THIS STUDY WILL RECEIVE A CORE WEIGHT LOSS 101 SESSION AND WILL BE ASKED TO SELF-MONITOR DIETARY INTAKE, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, AND WEIGHT DAILY USING STUDY-PROVIDED TOOLS (A FITBIT ACTIVITY MONITOR, FITBIT E-SCALE, AND THE FITBIT SMARTPHONE APP). EACH WEEK FOR 16 WEEKS PARTICIPANTS WILL RECEIVE BASIC FEEDBACK ON THE FREQUENCY OF THEIR SELF-MONITORING OF DIETARY INTAKE, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, AND WEIGHT AND THEIR WEIGHT TRAJECTORY, AND WILL BE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO RECEIVE (OR NOT RECEIVE) EACH OF FOUR ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK COMPONENTS (CALORIE GOAL ATTAINMENT, DIET QUALITY, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GOAL ATTAINMENT, AND PROMPTED GOAL SETTING). WE WILL USE MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS TO INVESTIGATE THE IMPACT OF EACH FEEDBACK COMPONENT ON WEIGHT CHANGE (PRIMARY OUTCOME) AND ON PROPOSED MECHANISMS (ADHERENCE TO SELF-MONITORING AND TO CALORIC INTAKE AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GOALS) DURING THE WEEK AFTER IT IS RECEIVED. WE WILL ALSO INVESTIGATE THE IMPACT OF THE NUMBER OF FEEDBACK COMPONENTS RECEIVED, POTENTIAL MODERATORS OF FEEDBACK EFFICACY (E.G., AGE, SEX/GENDER, RACE/ETHNICITY, SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, SOCIAL SUPPORT, FOOD SECURITY) AND WHETHER DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF FEEDBACK ARE MORE EFFECTIVE WHEN INDIVIDUALS ARE DOING WELL IN THE PROGRAM (I.E., MEETING PROGRAM GOALS) VERSUS WHEN THEY ARE NOT DOING WELL, ALLOWING US TO DEVELOP PERSONALIZED ALGORITHMS FOR FEEDBACK PROVISION. FOR AIM 2, WE WILL EMPLOY USER-CENTERED DESIGN METHODS TO DEVELOP, REFINE (VIA ITERATIVE DEVELOPMENT/TESTING CYCLES IN STUDY 2), AND CONDUCT “REAL WORLD” USABILITY TESTING WITH COMMUNITY INTERVENTION FACILITATORS (STUDY 3) OF A SEMI-AUTOMATED SELF-MONITORING FEEDBACK SYSTEM THAT AIMS TO COMBINE THE EFFICIENCY OF COMPUTER AUTOMATION WITH THE EXPERTISE OF TARGET USERS. COMMUNITY INTERVENTION FACILITATORS WILL BE ABLE TO USE THIS SYSTEM TO QUICKLY DEVELOP EFFECTIVE SELF-MONITORING FEEDBACK FOR DELIVERY OF THIS ESSENTIAL TREATMENT COMPONENT ACROSS A RANGE OF COMMUNITY INTERVENTION SETTINGS, BROADLY IMPROVING ACCESS TO EFFECTIVE TREATMENT FOR ADULT OVERWEIGHT AND OBESITY.
Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (fac.gov)
Total Audits
3
Clean Audits
3
Material Weakness
No
Noncompliance Issues
No
| Year | Status | Financial Report | Federal Expenditure | Low Risk | Accepted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Clean | Unmodified (Clean) | $3.7M | Yes | 2019-07-17 |
| 2017 | Clean | Unmodified (Clean) | $3.5M | No | 2018-07-15 |
| 2016 | Clean | Unmodified (Clean) | $3.6M | No | 2017-08-13 |
Financial Report
Unmodified (Clean)
Federal Expenditure
$3.7M
Financial Report
Unmodified (Clean)
Federal Expenditure
$3.5M
Financial Report
Unmodified (Clean)
Federal Expenditure
$3.6M
Source: IRS e-Filed Form 990
No officer or director compensation data available for this organization.
This data is sourced from IRS Form 990, Part VII. It may not be available if the organization files Form 990-N (e-Postcard) or has not yet been enriched.
Source: IRS Publication 78, Auto-Revocation List & e-Postcard Data
Tax-deductible contributions: Yes
Deductibility code: GROUP,SOUNK
Sources: IRS e-Filed Form 990 (XML) & ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Scroll →
| Year | Revenue | Contributions | Expenses | Assets | Net Assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $258.2M | $7.3M | $418.1M | $3.9B | -$2.1B |
| 2022 | $139.2M | $212.6K | $349.9M | $1.5B | -$1.9B |
| 2021 | $666.7M | $130.5K | $728.4M | $4.6B | -$1.7B |
| 2020 | $655.2M | -$28.7K | $747M | $4.3B |
Sources: ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer & IRS e-File Index
| Tax Year | Form Type | Source | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 990 | IRS e-File | PDF not yet published by IRSView Filing → |
| 2023 | 990 | DataIRS e-File | |
| 2022 | 990 | DataIRS e-File |
Financial data: IRS Form 990 via ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer (Tax Year 2023)
Federal grants: USAspending.gov (live)
Organization info: IRS Business Master File · ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Tax-deductibility: IRS Publication 78
| -$1.9B |
| 2019 | $935.4M | $99.8K | $848.3M | $3.2B | -$2B |
| 2018 | $1.2B | $48.5K | $1.2B | $2.6B | -$2.3B |
| 2017 | $1.2B | $822K | $1.1B | $2.9B | -$2.1B |
| 2016 | $1.1B | $887.1K | $1.1B | $2.5B | -$2.3B |
| 2015 | $988.2M | $1.1M | $946.7M | $2.1B | -$2.3B |
| 2014 | $1.1B | $6.6M | $982.6M | $2.4B | -$2B |
| 2013 | $975.9M | $7.6M | $983.9M | $2.1B | -$2B |
| 2012 | $884.2M | $2.1M | $939.9M | $2B | -$2.2B |
| 2011 | $746.4M | $958.1K | $802M | $1.8B | -$1.4B |
| 2021 | 990 | Data |
| 2020 | 990 | Data |
| 2019 | 990 | Data |
| 2018 | 990 | Data |
| 2017 | 990 | Data |
| 2016 | 990 | Data |
| 2015 | 990 | Data |
| 2014 | 990 | Data |
| 2013 | 990 | Data |
| 2012 | 990 | Data |
| 2011 | 990 | Data |
| 2010 | 990 | — |
| 2009 | 990 | — |
| 2008 | 990 | — |
| 2007 | 990 | — |
| 2006 | 990 | — |
| 2005 | 990 | — |
| 2004 | 990 | — |
| 2003 | 990 | — |
| 2002 | 990 | — |
| 2001 | 990 | — |