Loading organization details...
Loading organization details...
Source: IRS Form 990 via ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Total Revenue
▼$16.8M
Total Contributions
$7.6M
Total Expenses
▼$16.3M
Total Assets
$26.1M
Total Liabilities
▼$1.6M
Net Assets
$24.6M
Officer Compensation
→$426.9K
Other Salaries
$8.9M
Investment Income
▼$354.4K
Fundraising
▼$18.9K
Source: USAspending.gov · Searched by organization name
Total Federal Funding
$2.6M
Awards Found
1
Department of Health and Human Services
$2.6M
BINAURAL CUE SENSITIVITY IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS WITH COMBINED ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION - PROJECT SUMMARY COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION WITH MINIMALLY TRAUMATIC SURGICAL TECHNIQUES AND ATRAUMATIC ELECTRODE ARRAYS HAS LED TO AN INCREASING PREVALENCE OF ADULT AND PEDIATRIC COCHLEAR IMPLANT (CI) RECIPIENTS WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR COMBINED ELECTRIC AND BINAURAL ACOUSTIC STIMULATION (EAS). MANY STUDIES HAVE DEMONSTRATED THAT ADULT EAS USERS CONSISTENTLY EXHIBIT SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS FOR SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN NOISE AND SPATIAL HEARING TASKS AS COMPARED TO A CI PAIRED ONLY WITH A CONTRALATERAL HA. WE HAVE ALSO DEMONSTRATED THAT SENSITIVITY TO INTERAURAL TIME DIFFERENCE (ITD) AND INTERAURAL LEVEL DIFFERENCE (ILD) CUES IS CORRELATED WITH EAS BENEFIT FOR POSTLINGUALLY DEAFENED ADULT LISTENERS. DESPITE THIS ACTIVE PHASE OF DISCOVERY, THERE IS STILL A STRIKING PAUCITY OF RESEARCH ON EAS OUTCOMES IN PEDIATRIC CI USERS, THE EXPECTED TRAJECTORY OF BENEFIT FOLLOWING EAS FITTING, AS WELL AS UNDERLYING MECHANISMS DRIVING EAS BENEFIT (OR LACK THEREOF) IN ALL POPULATIONS. THERE IS A DISCONNECT BETWEEN EAS AVAILABILITY AND EAS UTILIZATION IN ALL CI RECIPIENTS AND CURRENT AUDIOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF EAS CANDIDATES IS NOT DATA DRIVEN. THIS IS PROBLEMATIC GIVEN THE PROTRACTED MATURATION OF THE BINAURAL SYSTEM AND THE FACT THAT WE DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ADDITIONAL EFFECTS SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS AND COMBINED EAS MAY HAVE ON THE DEVELOPING BINAURAL SYSTEM. THE PROPOSED RESEARCH ACTIVITIES WILL DESCRIBE THE TIME COURSE OF BINAURAL DEVELOPMENT USING BEHAVIORAL AND OBJECTIVE RESPONSES TO INTERAURAL DIFFERENCES IN TIMING (PHASE) AND LEVEL AS WELL AS ALLOW FOR A NATURAL FACTOR INVESTIGATION OF A CLINICAL INTERVENTION, THE EAS FITTING, ON SAID DEVELOPMENT. WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF A CLINICAL TRIAL, WE WILL COMPARE ACUTE AND CHRONIC EAS OUTCOMES FOR SPEECH RECOGNITION AND SPATIAL HEARING AS RELATED TO BINAURAL CUE SENSITIVITY, CUE WEIGHTING, AND UNDERLYING NEURAL SYNCHRONY NECESSARY FOR ITD RESOLUTION. WE HAVE PROPOSED A SINGLE-GROUP ASSIGNMENT FOR BOTH ADULT AND PEDIATRIC EAS USERS AND WILL ALSO INCLUDE CHRONOLOGICAL- AND HEARING-AGE-MATCHED LISTENERS WITH NORMAL HEARING (NH). A WITHIN-SUBJECTS, ACCELERATED LONGITUDINAL DESIGN FOR BOTH EAS AND NH LISTENERS WILL PROVIDE INSIGHT INTO THE DEVELOPMENTAL TRAJECTORY OF THE BINAURAL SYSTEM FOR CHILDREN NH AND WILL PROVIDE A BENCHMARK FOR INTERPRETING EFFECTS OF SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS, ASYMMETRY IN AUDIBILITY RESULTING FROM COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION, AND EAS USE ON SAID TRAJECTORY. OUR PROPOSED RESEARCH ACTIVITIES WILL HELP CLOSE THE GAP BETWEEN WHAT IS TECHNOLOGICALLY POSSIBLE WITH EAS TECHNOLOGY AND WHAT IS CLINICALLY IMPLEMENTED BY OTOLOGISTS AND AUDIOLOGISTS INVESTIGATING DEVELOPMENT OF BINAURAL SENSITIVITY AND SPATIAL HEARING ABILITIES. THE RESULTANT DATA WILL COMPRISE THE FIRST COMPREHENSIVE DESCRIPTION OF BEHAVIORAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC MEASURES OF BINAURAL HEARING IN ADULTS AND CHILDREN BOTH WITH NH AND EAS AND WILL UNCOVER INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EAS CLINICAL POPULATIONS HOLDING HIGH POTENTIAL FOR CLINICAL APPLICATION IN DEVICE FITTINGS AS WELL AS AUDIOLOGIC AND OTOLOGIC CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION.
Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (fac.gov)
No federal single audit records found for this organization.
Single audits are required for entities expending $750,000+ in federal awards annually.
Source: IRS e-Filed Form 990
No officer or director compensation data available for this organization.
This data is sourced from IRS Form 990, Part VII. It may not be available if the organization files Form 990-N (e-Postcard) or has not yet been enriched.
Source: IRS Publication 78, Auto-Revocation List & e-Postcard Data
Tax-deductible contributions: Yes
Deductibility code: PC
Sources: IRS e-Filed Form 990 (XML) & ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Scroll →
| Year | Revenue | Contributions | Expenses | Assets | Net Assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $16.8M | $7.6M | $16.3M | $26.1M | $24.6M |
| 2023 | $13M | $5.5M | $13.6M | $24.5M | $23.2M |
| 2022 | $19.7M | $13M | $12.2M | $24.3M | $23.2M |
| 2021 | $11.6M | $6.6M | $10.6M | $18.3M |
Sources: ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer & IRS e-File Index
| Tax Year | Form Type | Source | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 990 | DataIRS e-File | PDF not yet published by IRSView Filing → |
| 2023 | 990 | DataIRS e-File | |
| 2022 | 990 | Data |
Financial data: IRS Form 990 via ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer (Tax Year 2024)
Federal grants: USAspending.gov (live)
Organization info: IRS Business Master File · ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Tax-deductibility: IRS Publication 78
| $16.6M |
| 2020 | $10.2M | $5.1M | $9.7M | $17.6M | $15.6M |
| 2019 | $10.2M | $5M | $8.2M | $16M | $15M |
| 2018 | $6.7M | $2.3M | $6.4M | $13.8M | $13M |
| 2017 | $5.6M | $2.4M | $4.9M | $13.4M | $12.6M |
| 2016 | $7.6M | $5.1M | $3.8M | $13.5M | $11.9M |
| 2015 | $5.7M | $3.6M | $3.5M | $8.5M | $8.2M |
| 2014 | $7.4M | $5.4M | $3.2M | $6.2M | $6M |
| 2013 | $2.7M | $1.3M | $2.4M | $1.9M | $1.8M |
| 2012 | $2.4M | $1.3M | $2M | $1.6M | $1.4M |
| 2011 | $2.2M | $985K | $1.9M | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| 2021 | 990 | Data |
| 2020 | 990 | Data |
| 2019 | 990 | Data |
| 2018 | 990 | Data |
| 2017 | 990 | Data |
| 2016 | 990 | Data |
| 2015 | 990 | Data |
| 2014 | 990 | Data |
| 2013 | 990 | Data |
| 2012 | 990 | Data |
| 2011 | 990 | Data |
| 2010 | 990 | — |
| 2009 | 990 | — |
| 2008 | 990 | — |
| 2007 | 990 | — |
| 2006 | 990 | — |
| 2005 | 990 | — |
| 2004 | 990 | — |
| 2003 | 990-EZ | — |