Loading organization details...
Loading organization details...
Source: IRS Form 990 via ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Total Revenue
▼$13.8M
Total Contributions
$9M
Total Expenses
▼$13.9M
Total Assets
$19.7M
Total Liabilities
▼$8.9M
Net Assets
$10.8M
Officer Compensation
→$824.8K
Other Salaries
$5.6M
Investment Income
▼$134.3K
Fundraising
▼$0
Source: USAspending.gov · Searched by organization name
Total Federal Funding
$16M
Awards Found
9
Department of Energy
$3.6M
ASSIST STATES TO ADOPT ENHANCEMENTS TO THE RESIDENTIAL CHAPTER OF THE IECC, PUTTING THESE STATES ON A PATHWAY TO NET-ZERO ENERGY AND EMISSIONS FOR NEW HOMES. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES INCLUDE: (1) THREE SETS OF AMENDMENTS TO THE IECC DEVELOPED FOR USE BY STATES AND OTHER JURISDICTIONS (ZERO READY, NEAR ZERO, AND ZERO); (2) SUPPORTING MATERIALS AND ANALYSES FOR THESE THREE CODE PACKAGES PREPARED TO ASSIST JURISDICTIONS WITH ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AMENDMENTS; (3) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (TA) PROVIDED TO AT LEAST 18 STATES AND JURISDICTIONS TO ASSIST WITH ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AMENDMENTS, AND ALSO TO UTILITIES IN COALITION STATES ON PROGRAMS PROMOTING HIGHER AMENDMENT TIERS; (4) AT LEAST NINE STATES OR JURISDICTIONS ADOPT THE AMENDMENTS, AT LEAST IN PART; (5) EXPLORING A PATH FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES TO ADOPT OUR ZERO READY TIER AS A POSSIBLE REQUIREMENT FOR NEW HOMES BACKED BY FEDERAL MORTGAGES; (6) REVIEWING AND REVISING THE AMENDMENTS AND SUPPORTING MATERIALS BASED ON INITIAL STATE EXPERIENCE WITH THE AMENDMENTS AND FEEDBACK FROM AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND EQUITY GROUPS; (7) AMENDMENTS PROPOSED TO THE IECC AS TECHNICAL APPENDICES TO THE 2030 IECC; (8) INSTITUTING A PLAN FOR AMENDMENT PACKAGE SUSTAINABILITY BEYOND THE FUNDING PERIOD.
Environmental Protection Agency
$790K
THE GOAL OF THIS PROJECT IS TO PROMOTE PRODUCTS, TECHNOLOGIES, AND PRACTICES THAT IMPROVE ENERGY EFFICIENCY. THE PROJECT WILL WORK TO IMPROVE MARKET
Department of Agriculture
$595K
DATA-DRIVEN MARKET TRANSFORMATION FOR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTAGRICULTURE
Environmental Protection Agency
$270K
TO REDUCE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS THROUGH ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN HOMES AND BUILDINGS USING MARKET BASED APPROACHES.
Environmental Protection Agency
$112.1K
TO ASSESS BEST PRACTICES FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY POLICY MODELING, AND CREATE A STATE ENERGY EFFICIENCY SCORECARD AND BEST PRACTICES CLEARINGHOUSE.
Environmental Protection Agency
$60K
THE WORK TO BE COMPLETED INCLUDES RESEARCH STUDIES THAT WILL HELP IDENTIFY BEST PRACTICES AND APPROACHES THAT INFORM THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FUTURE ENERGY EFFICIENTCY (EE) PROGRAMS. THE STUDIES ARE NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT LOW-COST EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS FROM EE PROGRAMS CONTINUE TO MATERIALIZE. SUCH EE PROGRAMS ' INCLUDING THOSE THAT LEVERAGE EPA'S ENERGY STAR ' NOT ONLY SAVE CONSUMERS AND BUSINESSES MONEY BUT PROVIDE A NO-REGRETS SOURCE OF COST-EFFECTIVE, VOLUNTARY EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS. ONGOING RESEARCH IS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT STAKEHOLDERS WORKING TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT EE PROGRAMS HAVE UPDATED INFORMATION THAT HELPS THEM STAY AHEAD OF A RAPIDLY EVOLVING MARKETPLACE. THE RESEARCH STUDIES TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THIS PROJECT WILL THEREFORE HELP ENSURE THAT EE PROGRAMS CONTINUE TO BE COST-EFFECTIVE, WHILE SUPPORTING ECONOMIC GROWTH, CREATING JOBS, AND REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ENERGY USE.
Environmental Protection Agency
$25K
THE PRIMARY GOAL OF THIS PROJECT IS TO DEVELOP, EXTERNALLY REVIEW, AND PUBLISH TECHNICAL REPORT(S) TO INFORM CONSUMERS, STATES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, UTILITIES, AND BUSINESSES OF POTENTIAL ENERGY SAVINGS IN SMART TECHNOLOGIES AND HOW ENERGY EFFICIENCY (EE) CAN SUPPORT ELECTRIC SYSTEM RELIABILITY. THE REPORTS WILL INCLUDE THE STATUS/MATURITY OF THE SMART TECHNOLOGIES MARKET, METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING ACCURATE ESTIMATES OF ENERGY SAVINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO SMART TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION, AND IDENTIFYING EE PROGRAMS THAT HAVE HIGH VALUE FOR SYSTEM RELIABILITY. THE AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY (ACEEE) IS A NONPROFIT, 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATION FOUNDED IN 1980 BY PROMINENT RESEARCHERS IN THE ENERGY FIELD, ACTS AS A CATALYST TO ADVANCE ENERGY EFFICIENCY POLICIES, PROGRAMS, TECHNOLOGIES, INVESTMENTS, AND BEHAVIORS. THE ACEEE IS RECOGNIZED AS AMERICA'S LEADING CENTER ON EE EXPERTISE BECAUSE OF ITS CREDIBLE, HIGH-QUALITY, AND RELEVANT TECHNICAL WORK.
Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (fac.gov)
Total Audits
2
Clean Audits
2
Material Weakness
No
Noncompliance Issues
No
| Year | Status | Financial Report | Federal Expenditure | Low Risk | Accepted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Clean | Unmodified (Clean) | $3.3M | No | 2025-06-24 |
| 2023 | Clean | Unmodified (Clean) | $1.4M | No | 2024-09-30 |
Financial Report
Unmodified (Clean)
Federal Expenditure
$3.3M
Financial Report
Unmodified (Clean)
Federal Expenditure
$1.4M
Source: IRS e-Filed Form 990
No officer or director compensation data available for this organization.
This data is sourced from IRS Form 990, Part VII. It may not be available if the organization files Form 990-N (e-Postcard) or has not yet been enriched.
Source: IRS Publication 78, Auto-Revocation List & e-Postcard Data
Tax-deductible contributions: Yes
Deductibility code: PC
Sources: IRS e-Filed Form 990 (XML) & ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Scroll →
| Year | Revenue | Contributions | Expenses | Assets | Net Assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $13.8M | $9M | $13.9M | $19.7M | $10.8M |
| 2022 | $10.4M | $6.4M | $13M | $18.6M | $9.9M |
| 2021 | $13.1M | $11M | $10M | $16.6M | $14.2M |
| 2020 | $8M | $6.3M | $9.2M | $12.3M | $10.3M |
Sources: ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer & IRS e-File Index
| Tax Year | Form Type | Source | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 990 | IRS e-File | PDF not yet published by IRSView Filing → |
| 2023 | 990 | DataIRS e-File | PDF not yet published by IRSView Filing → |
| 2022 | 990 | DataIRS e-File |
Financial data: IRS Form 990 via ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer (Tax Year 2023)
Federal grants: USAspending.gov (live)
Organization info: IRS Business Master File · ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
Tax-deductibility: IRS Publication 78
| 2019 | $9.2M | $6.6M | $9.4M | $11.8M | $10.7M |
| 2018 | $11.8M | $7.6M | $9.4M | $10.8M | $10M |
| 2017 | $8.1M | $4.7M | $9.4M | $8.9M | $8.1M |
| 2016 | $10.6M | $6.4M | $9.2M | $9.8M | $8.9M |
| 2015 | $8.5M | $5.1M | $8.1M | $8.3M | $7.7M |
| 2014 | $8.6M | $4.9M | $8.2M | $8.2M | $7.4M |
| 2013 | $7.6M | $4.7M | $7.4M | $7.5M | $6.8M |
| 2012 | $7.4M | $4.2M | $7.2M | $6.8M | $6.3M |
| 2011 | $7.2M | $5.3M | $6.6M | $6.4M | $5.9M |
| 2021 | 990 | Data |
| 2020 | 990 | Data | PDF not yet published by IRS |
| 2019 | 990 | Data |
| 2018 | 990 | Data |
| 2017 | 990 | Data | PDF not yet published by IRS |
| 2016 | 990 | Data |
| 2015 | 990 | Data |
| 2014 | 990 | Data |
| 2013 | 990 | Data |
| 2012 | 990 | Data |
| 2011 | 990 | Data |
| 2010 | 990 | — |
| 2009 | 990 | — |
| 2008 | 990 | — |
| 2007 | 990 | — |
| 2006 | 990 | — |
| 2005 | 990 | — |
| 2004 | 990 | — |
| 2003 | 990 | — |
| 2002 | 990 | — |
| 2001 | 990 | — |